Discover and explore top open-source AI tools and projects—updated daily.
meta-promptingElevating LLM reasoning through structural prompting
Top 96.8% on SourcePulse
Summary
This repository provides the official implementation for "Meta Prompting for AI Systems," a novel framework designed to significantly elevate the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). It addresses the limitations of traditional few-shot prompting by introducing example-agnostic structural templates that guide LLM problem-solving. The framework targets researchers and engineers seeking more robust, efficient, and theoretically grounded methods for interacting with LLMs, offering a path to state-of-the-art performance on complex benchmarks with substantial token efficiency gains.
How It Works
Meta Prompting (MP) employs high-level, structural templates that dictate how to think, rather than providing specific examples of what to think. This approach teaches LLMs reusable, structured reasoning procedures applicable to entire categories of tasks. The framework is rigorously formalized using category theory, where MP is modeled as a functor mapping tasks to prompts, guaranteeing compositional problem-solving. Recursive Meta Prompting (RMP) further automates prompt engineering by formalizing the LLM's self-improvement loop as a monad, enabling principled prompt refinement and generation. This contrasts sharply with few-shot methods that rely on learning patterns from concrete, content-rich examples.
Quick Start & Requirements
The prompts utilized in the paper are readily available within the /prompts directory for direct integration with LLMs. Interactive demos are accessible via custom GPTs, including CR Agent (v0.1, v0.2), MP-PT (Online Demo), and MP-ICPD (Online Demo). The foundational research paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.11482. The README does not specify code execution requirements, installation procedures, or explicit dependencies beyond the need for an LLM.
Highlighted Details
Maintenance & Community
The provided README does not include details regarding specific contributors, community support channels (such as Discord or Slack), or a public roadmap for future development.
Licensing & Compatibility
Crucially, the repository's README omits any mention of a software license. This lack of explicit licensing information presents a significant barrier to adoption, particularly for commercial use or integration into closed-source projects, and requires immediate clarification.
Limitations & Caveats
The README focuses heavily on the project's performance achievements and does not explicitly enumerate limitations, known bugs, or its development stage (e.g., alpha/beta). The primary and most critical caveat for potential adopters is the absence of clear licensing terms.
2 weeks ago
1 day
open-thought
SamsungSAILMontreal