Discover and explore top open-source AI tools and projects—updated daily.
andrehuangAI agents for strategic research ideation and validation
New!
Top 68.0% on SourcePulse
Strategic research thinking agents for Claude Code and Codex, andrehuang/research-companion assists researchers in evaluating ideas, triaging projects, and structuring brainstorming sessions. It aims to help users identify and pursue high-impact research opportunities, acting as a critical AI colleague to ensure time is invested wisely. The project targets researchers and power users seeking to improve their research strategy and decision-making process.
How It Works
The project employs three core agents: the Idea Critic, which stress-tests research concepts across seven dimensions (novelty, impact, timing, feasibility, competitive landscape, the nugget, and narrative potential) to provide a Pursue/Refine/Kill verdict; the Research Strategist, for project-level triage, comparative advantage mapping, and impact forecasting; and the Brainstormer, focused on generating novel cross-field connections and challenging flawed assumptions. A primary /research-companion skill orchestrates these agents through a structured six-phase ideation session, incorporating Nicholas Carlini's "conclusion-first test" to ensure ideas have a clear, compelling outcome before significant investment.
Quick Start & Requirements
claude plugin marketplace add https://github.com/andrehuang/research-companionclaude plugin install research-companion@andrehuang-research-companiondocs/codex-installation.md for detailed instructions, including repo-scoped and local marketplace installation.Highlighted Details
research-evaluations/) to accumulate insights across sessions.Maintenance & Community
The provided README does not detail specific contributors, community channels (e.g., Discord, Slack), or roadmap information.
Licensing & Compatibility
The project is released under the MIT License, which is generally permissive for commercial use and integration into closed-source projects.
Limitations & Caveats
The agents are intentionally "opinionated and direct," prioritizing honest feedback over user comfort. The tool focuses on strategic decision-making regarding what research to pursue, rather than assisting with the technical how-to of writing papers. Its bluntness may not suit all users, and it is designed to help kill unpromising ideas early.
2 days ago
Inactive
grapeot