Discover and explore top open-source AI tools and projects—updated daily.
matty69vAI agents for offensive security and bug bounty hunting
New!
Top 94.2% on SourcePulse
Summary
This repository offers a curated collection of specialized AI agent prompts designed for bug bounty hunting, penetration testing, and offensive security workflows. It targets security professionals and researchers who utilize agent-capable Large Language Models (LLMs) like Claude, Copilot, and Cursor. The primary benefit is transforming generic LLMs into specialized security assistants with built-in scope enforcement, eliminating the need for complex frameworks or dependencies.
How It Works
The project leverages disciplined, well-defined prompts that act as "drop-in personas" for LLM clients. Each prompt guides the LLM to adopt a specific security role, such as reconnaissance, web vulnerability hunting, or exploit chaining. This approach allows users to integrate specialized AI assistance directly into their existing workflows without introducing new tooling, relying on the LLM's capabilities rather than external scanners. Strict scope enforcement is a core design principle, ensuring agents operate within defined boundaries.
Quick Start & Requirements
git clone https://github.com/matty69v/Bug-Bounty-Agents.git) and run the ./install.sh script, which auto-detects and configures agents for supported clients. Specific targets like --target claude or --target copilot are available.Highlighted Details
Maintenance & Community
The project is maintained via GitHub issues and pull requests, with clear contribution guidelines provided. While specific community channels like Discord or Slack are not listed, the repository structure encourages community involvement through its contribution process.
Licensing & Compatibility
The project is licensed under the MIT License, permitting broad use, modification, and distribution, including for commercial purposes, with standard attribution requirements.
Limitations & Caveats
These agents function as prompt-based methodologies, not automated scanners; users remain responsible for driving the engagement and interpreting results. The effectiveness relies on the LLM's adherence to the prompt's instructions and scope limitations.
3 weeks ago
Inactive