Discover and explore top open-source AI tools and projects—updated daily.
robzilla1738Autonomous software development agent
Top 74.2% on SourcePulse
This project addresses the challenge of autonomously planning and executing complex software development tasks end-to-end. It targets engineers and power users working with AI coding assistants like Claude Code and Codex CLI, offering a significant reduction in human interaction from numerous turns to a single approval and paste, thereby accelerating development cycles.
How It Works
Supergoal transforms task execution by first performing deep planning, including codebase recon, risk assessment, and memory integration. It then decomposes the task into an adaptive number of phases, generating detailed specs. The user approves this plan once and pastes a single /goal command. From this point, the system autonomously executes each phase sequentially, incorporating a robust 3-strike self-healing recovery mechanism for failures (retry, fix-spec, handoff). Each phase includes verification checks, and learnings are written back to memory, enabling smarter future runs. A final audit re-verifies against the original plan before completion.
Quick Start & Requirements
/plugin marketplace add https://github.com/robzilla1738/supergoal.git, followed by /plugin install supergoal@supergoal and /reload-plugins. Manual installation involves cloning to ~/.claude/skills and running /reload-plugins.~/.codex/skills and restarting Codex./goal command. GitHub SSH keys may be required for shorthand cloning; otherwise, use the HTTPS URL.Highlighted Details
.supergoal/ to prevent conflicts.Maintenance & Community
The project is at version v0.7.0, with a CHANGELOG.md available for release notes. Specific community links or contributor details are not detailed in the provided README.
Licensing & Compatibility
Limitations & Caveats
Running multiple /goal executions concurrently within the same working tree is unsafe; users should employ separate git worktrees for true parallel development. If subjective UI/UX criteria constitute over 30% of verification checks, the final completion message may include a warning banner. Persistent gaps or repeated failures will result in a process handoff to the user.
4 days ago
Inactive
grapeot