Discover and explore top open-source AI tools and projects—updated daily.
brycewang-stanfordAI workflows for academic journal submissions
Top 48.2% on SourcePulse
Summary
This repository provides journal-specific AI "skill packs" for Claude Code/Codex, designed to accelerate academic publishing. Targeting researchers across disciplines, it offers tailored workflows from topic selection to manuscript revision, addressing the unique requirements of over 200 mainstream journals and conferences.
How It Works
The project's core innovation lies in creating distinct "skill packs" for individual academic journals and conferences. These packs encode specific editorial preferences, formatting guidelines, and review cultures, enabling AI models to provide highly tailored assistance. This journal-centric approach surpasses generic academic writing tools by addressing the nuanced differences in publication standards and common rejection points across various top-tier venues.
Quick Start & Requirements
Installation is primarily achieved through the Claude Code plugin marketplace using commands like /plugin marketplace add [URL] and /plugin install [skill-name]. Users require access to Claude Code or Codex. Detailed installation instructions and usage examples are provided within the README.
Highlighted Details
Maintenance & Community
The project is curated and maintained by Stanford REAP (Empirical Methods Team) and CoPaper.AI, with the underlying AI engine powered by StatsPAI. Community engagement is primarily facilitated through CoPaper.AI's WeChat Official Account.
Licensing & Compatibility
The project is released under the MIT License, permitting broad use, modification, and distribution, including for commercial purposes and integration into closed-source projects.
Limitations & Caveats
The effectiveness of these skill packs is dependent on the capabilities of the Claude Code/Codex AI models. Users must independently verify dynamic journal-specific information such as impact factors, page fees, and submission deadlines against official sources. While designed to significantly aid the publication process, these tools do not guarantee manuscript acceptance.
18 hours ago
Inactive