Discover and explore top open-source AI tools and projects—updated daily.
zhnnky329AI-powered workflow for mathematical modeling contests
Top 87.9% on SourcePulse
<2-3 sentences summarising what the project addresses and solves, the target audience, and the benefit.> This project provides a structured workflow orchestrator for math modeling competitions, designed to mitigate common pitfalls like misinterpreting problems or unproducible numbers. It targets students and researchers by enforcing rigorous checks and traceability throughout the modeling process, ensuring reproducibility and preventing workflow errors. The core benefit is enhancing submission reliability while keeping critical modeling judgments with the user.
How It Works
The system implements a multi-stage, gate-driven pipeline (Groundwork, Method Validation, Code & Review, Results/Freeze, Paper Writing/Audits). Its novelty lies in explicit pass conditions for each "gate," ensuring no step is skipped. Key design choices include:
frozen_numbers.json, with modifications logged and re-frozen.Quick Start & Requirements
The recommended installation is cloning the repository into the contest project directory. Global installations for Claude Code or Codex are also supported.
git clone https://github.com/zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills.git .skills-tmp then use mv commands to integrate .claude, .codex, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, and skills-docs.CLAUDE.md (for Claude Code) or AGENTS.md (for Codex) must be present in the contest project.Highlighted Details
frozen_numbers.json, with changes logged and re-frozen (Gate G4).Maintenance & Community
Bug reports, ideas, and feedback are welcomed via email to zjzhang0424@gmail.com. GitHub Issues and Pull Requests are also accepted.
Licensing & Compatibility
Released under the permissive MIT License, generally allowing commercial use. However, users must independently verify contest-specific AI-use policies, as some competitions have strict originality requirements.
Limitations & Caveats
This tool automates workflow checks and reproducibility, not core modeling or writing. Critical modeling decisions and justifications remain the user's responsibility; the system blocks submission if these are incomplete or AI-generated. Users must independently confirm their specific contest's AI-use policies, as rules vary significantly.
2 months ago
Inactive
wandb
uditgoenka